3x3 or 4x4

3x3 is the standard formation of two BL teams.
4x4 is used a lot the last months to fit in all the pro's

It seems to me that 4x4 is a Lappers-Paradise. So consider not to host 8 but 9.
So there can be a Rogue to kill the potential lappers.

In this way there are more and better fights.

What do u think?

(excuse the bad grammer / english)

its recently really boring most of the time to have a 2x2 bl.

3x3 or 4x4... i dont mind. lapping and strategies to avoid it or fight it ... many interesting aspects

REV wrote:

It seems to me that 4x4 is a Lappers-Paradise. So consider not to host 8 but 9.
So there can be a Rogue to kill the potential lappers.

-1
In my opinion, having a rogue rarely makes for better games.

lol bb. sorry - i accidently (honest!) erased your post too.

fffrrrrrrrreeeeedom of speach! dude - dont do no shit mate!

lol

so now i know who is the admin-guy. roger that... 10-4.

Reposting:
If a rogue knows what to do (stopping lappers, helping in situations where appropriate and dont decide the whole game) i like roguing or being rogued.
Games that could be boring by setup (team-constellation) become surprisingly fun with a good rogue...

Lapping has become a big part of the game because holding is a big part of the game. I think of the lapper as analogous to the blitzer in American Football. Their job is to rush the passer and either tackle him or force him into a mistake. The lapper forces the race to move along at a faster pace and it puts some pressure on the players (ie. Ant, Lum, WS, Rev) who are very good at holding. The lapper has become somewhat necessary to negate that style of play (or capitalize on it). If someone is consistently getting lapped they need to improve on their escape skills.

I would also say that I wouldn't try to lap so much if players wrestled less and drove more. Generally, I am a much better player at high speeds than at slow ones anyway.

Lastly, like Lum I am not a big fan of rogues.